This website is using cookies
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on this website.
User's name / E-mail address


I lost my password
Date: 2007
Page count: 580 pages
Format: B/5
ISBN: 978-963-9664-69-2
Category: from English

Original price: 4800 Ft

How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed

Learning From Past Societies

Third Raft -
September 26, 2006

Learning from Past Societies PDF - In 2005 Jared Diamond, author of the runaway bestseller Guns, Germs, and Steel, did it again. His new book, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed set the new standard for serious studies of how we can learn from past societies to save our own. In 2006 a new similar book appeared: Treading Lightly: The Hidden Wisdom of the World's Oldest People. This is a provocative study of the the Australian Aborigines, who discovered how to live sustainably for an astonishing 40,000 years.

This 20 page paper takes a hard look at these two books. Here is the abstract:

Recent books like Treading Lightly and Collapse have made serious efforts to learn sustainability lessons from past societies, notably the Australian Aborigines and Easter Island Polynesians. The premise is that there is much to learn from the few successes of past societies that were sustainable, and from the many failures of those that were not.

Up to this point, this sounds like your normal book review. But the abstract continues, and takes a fork in the road:

This paper argues that the premise is sound, but the approach used in executing the premise in these works is not. The approach lacks the full analytical rigor necessary to extract valuable cause and effect insights that are highly applicable to today's sustainability problem. This paper explores this proposition by assessing the process maturity used in the two books. It concludes that while both books have taken valuable first steps, the chief value of works like these lies in the accumulation of data that can be used in future analyses, ones that are more analytical than intuitive.

What? The best book in the world on the subject, Collapse, has failed "to extract valuable cause and effect insights that are highly applicable to today's sustainability problem?" Is this true? And if so, why?

The answer may both surprise and enlighten.


Jack Harich

Connected reviews