A kötet bibliográfiája

Bibliography

Albert, David Z. 1992. Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Albert, Michael. 1992-93. “Not all stories are equal: Michael Albert answers the porno advocates”. Z Papers Special Issue on Postmodernism and Rationality. Available on-line at http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/albertpomoreply.html

Albert, Michael. 1996. “Science, post modernism and the left”. Z Magazine 9(7/8) (July/August): 64-69.

Alliez, Eric. 1993. La Signature du monde, ou Qu'est-ce que la philosophie de Deleuxe et Guattari? Paris: Éditions du Cerf.

Althusser, Louis. 1993. Écrits sur la psychanalyse: Freud et Lacan. Paris: Stock/IMEC.

Amsterdamska, Olga. 1990. “Surely you are joking, Monsieur Latour!” Science, Technology, & Human Values 15: 495-504.

Andreski, Stanislau. 1972. Social Sciences as Sorcery. London: André Deutsch.

Anyon, Roger, TJ. Ferguson, Loretta Jackson and Lillie Lane. 1996. “Native American oral traditions and archaeology”. SAA Bulletin [Bulletin of the Society for American Archaeology) 14(2) (March/April): 14-16. Available on-line at
http://www.sscf.ucsb.edu/SAABulletin/14.2/SAA14.html

Arnol’d, Vladimir I. 1992. Catastrophe Theory, 3rd ed. Translated by G.S. Wassermann and R.K. Thomas. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Aronowitz, Stanley. 1997. “Alan Sokal’s ‘Transgression’ “. Dissent 44(1) (Winter): 107-110.

Badiou, Alain. 1982. Théorie du sujet. Paris: Seuil.

Bahcall, John N. 1990. “The solar-neutrino problem”. Scientific American 262(5) (May): 54-61.

Bahcall, John N., Flank Calaprice, Arthur B. McDonald, and Yoji Totsuka. 1996. „Solar neutrino experiments: The next generation”. Physics Today 49(7) (July): 30-36.

Barnes, Barry and David Bloor. 1981. “Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge”. In Rationality and Relativism, pages 21-47. Edited by Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes. Oxford: Blackwell.

Barnes, Barry, David Bloor, and John Henry. 1996. Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barsky, Robert F. 1997. Noam Chomsky: A Life of Dissent. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Barthes, Roland. 1970. “L’étrangére”. La Quinzaine Littéraire 94 (1-15 mai 1970): 19-20.

Baudrillard, Jean. 1990. Fatal Strategies. Translated by Philip Beitchman and W.G.J. Niesluchowski. Edited by Jim Fleming. New York: Semiotext(e). [French original: Les Stratégies fatales. Paris: Bernard Grasset, 1983.]

Baudrillard, Jean. 1993. The Transparency of Evil: Essays on Extreme Phenomena. Translated by James Benedict. London: Verso. [French original: La Transparence du mal. Paris: Galilée, 1990.]

Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. The Illusion of the End. Translated by Chris Turner. Cambridge, England: Polity Press. [French original: L’Illusion de la fin. Paris: Galilée, 1992.]

Baudrillard, Jean. 1995. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. Translated and with an introduction by Paul Patton. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [French original: La Guerre du Golfe n’a pas eu lieu. Paris: Galilée, 1991.]

Baudrillard, Jean. 1996. The Perfect Crime. Translated by Chris Turner. London: Verso. [French original: Le Crime parfait. Paris: Galilée, 1995.]

Baudrillard, Jean. 1997. Fragments: Cool Memories III, 1990-1995. Translated by Emily Agar. London: Verso. [French original: Fragments; Cool memories III 1990-1995. Paris: Galilée, 1995.]

Best, Steven. 1991. “Chaos and entropy: Metaphors in postmodern science and social theory.” Science as Culture 2(2) (no. 11): 188-226.

Bloor, David. 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Boghossian, Paul. 1996. “What the Sokal hoax ought to teach us.” Times Literary Supplement (13 December): 14-15.

Bouveresse, Jacques. 1984. Rationalité et cynisme. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

Boyer, Carl B. 1959 (1949]. The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development. With a foreword by R. Courant. New York: Dover.

Brecht, Bertolt. 1965. The Messingkauf Dialogues. Translated by John Willett. London: Methuen.

Bricmont, Jean. 1995a. “Science of chaos or chaos in science?” Physicalia Magazine 17, no. 3-4. Available on-line as publication UCL-IPT-96-03 at http://www.fyma.ucl.ac.be/reche/1996/1996.html [A slightly earlier version of this article appeared in Paul R. Gross, Norman Levitt and Martin W. Lewis, eds., The Flight from Science and Reason, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 775 (1996), pp. 131-175.]

Bricmont, Jean. 1995b. “Contre la philosophie de la mécanique quantique”. In Les Sciences et la philosophie. Quatorze essais de rapprochement, pp. 131-179. Edited by R. Franck. Paris: Vrin.

Broch, Henri. 1992. Au C?ur de l’extraordinaire. Bordeaux: L’Horizon Chimérique.

Brunet, Pierre. 1931. L’Introduction des théories de Newton en France au XVIII siécle. Paris: A. Blanchard. Reprinted by Slatkine, Genéve, 1970.

Brush, Stephen. 1989. “Prediction and theory evaluation: The case of light bending”. Science 246: 1124-1129.

Caroling, Peter. 1994. “The crack of time and the ideal game”. In Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy, pp. 73-98. Edited by Constantin V. Boundas and Dorothea Olkowski. New York: Routledge.

Chomsky, Noam. 1979. Language and Responsibility. Based on conversations with Mitsou Ronat. Translated by John Viertel. New York: Pantheon. [French original: Dialogues avec Mitsou Ronat. Paris: Flammarion, 1977.]

Chomsky, Noam. 1992-93. “Rationality/Science”. Z Papers Special Issue on Postmodernism and Rationality. Available on-line at http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/chompomoart.html

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. Year 501: The Conquest Continues. Boston: South End Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1994. Keeping the Rabble in Line: Interviews with David Barsamian. Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press.

Clavelin, Maurice. 1994. “L’histoire des sciences devant la sociologie de la science”. In Le Relativisme est-il résistible? Regards sur la sociologie des sciences, pp. 229-247. Edited by Raymond Boudon and Maurice Clavelin. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Coutty, Marc. 1998. “Des normaliens jugent l’affaire Sokal“. Interview with Mikael Cozic, Grégoire Kantardjian and Léon Loiseau. Le Monde de l’Éducation 255 (January): 8-10.

Crane, H.R. 1968. “The g factor of the electron”. Scientific American 218(1) (January): 72-85.

Dahan-Dalmedico, Amy. 1997. “Rire ou frémir?” La Recherche 304 (December): 10. [An extended version of this article appears in Revue de l’Association Henri Poincaré 9(7), décembre 1997, pp. 15-18.]

Damarin, Suzanne K. 1995. “Gender and mathematics from a feminist standpoint”. In: New Directions for Equity in Mathematics Education, pp. 242-257. Edited by Walter G. Secada, Elizabeth Fennema and Lisa Byrd Adajian. Published in collaboration with the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Darmon, Marc. 1990. Essais sur la topologic lacanienne. Paris: Éditions de 1'Assocation Freudienne.

Davenas, E. et al. 1988. “Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE”. Nature 333: 816-818.

Davis, Donald M. 1993. The Nature and Power of Mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dawkins, Richard. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.

Debray, Régis. 1980. Le Scribe: Genése du politique. Paris: Bernard Grasset.

Debray Régis. 1981. Critigue de la raison politique. Paris: Gallimard.

Debray, Régis. 1983. Critique of Political Reason. Translated by David Macey. London: New Left Books. [French original: see Debray 1981.]

Debray, Régis. 1994. Manifestes médiologiques. Paris: Gallimard.

Debray, Régis. 1996a. Media Manifestos: On the Technological Transmission of Cultural Forms. Translated by Eric Rauth. London: Verso. [French original: see Debray 1994.]

Debray, Régis. 1996b. “L’incomplétude, logique du religieux?” Bulletin de la société francaise de philosophie 90 (session of 27 January): 1-35.

de Genres, Pierre-Gilles. 1976. “La percolation: un concept unificateur”. La Recherche 72: 919-927.

Deleuze, Gilles. 1990. The Logic of Sense. Translated by Mark Lester with Charles Stivale. Edited by Constantin V. Boundas. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: Logique du sens. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1969.]

Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: Différence et répétition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1968.]

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translation and foreword by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [French original: Mille plateaux. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1980.]

Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari. 1994. What is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: Qu’est-ce que la philosophie? Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1991.]

Derrida, Jacques. 1970. “Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences”. In The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man: The Structuralist Controversy, pp. 247-272. Edited by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

Desanti, Jean Toussaint. 1975. La Philosophie silencieuse, ou critique des philosophies de la science. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Devitt, Michael. 1997. Realism and Truth, 2nd edition with a new afterword. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dhombres, Jean. 1994. “L’histoire des sciences mise en question par les approches sociologiques: le cas de la communauté scientifique francaise (1789-1815)”. In Le Relativisme est-il résistible? Regards sur la sociologie des sciences, pp. 159-205. Edited by Raymond Boudon and Maurice Clavelin. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Dieudonné, Jean Alexandre. 1989. A History of Algebraic and Differential Topology, 1900-1960. Boston: Birkhäuser.

Dobbs, Betty Jo Teeter, and Margaret C. Jacob. 1995. Newton and the Culture of Newtonianism. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

Donovan, Arthur, Larry Laudan, and Rachel Laudan. 1988. Scrutinizing Science:
Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Dordrecht–Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Droit, Roger-Pol. 1997. “Au risque du ‘scientifiquement correct’ “. Le Monde (30 September): 27.

D’Souza, Dinesh. 1991. Illiberal Education: The Politics of Race and Sex on Campus. New York: Free Press.

Duhem, Pierre. 1954 [1914]. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Translated by Philip E Wiener. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [French original: La Théorie physique: son objet, sa structure, 2éme éd. revue et augmentée. Paris: Riviére, 1914.]

Dumm, Thomas, Anne Norton et al. 1998. “On left conservatism”. Proceedings of a workshop at the University of California-Santa Cruz, 31 January 1998. Theory & Event, issues 2.2 and 2.3. Available on-line at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_&_event/

Eagleton, Terry. 1995. “Where do postmodernists come from?” Monthly Review 49(3) (July/August): 59-70. [Reprinted in Ellen Meiksins Wood and John Bellamy Foster, eds., In Defense of History, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1997, pp. 17-25; and in Terry Eagleton, The Illusions of Postmodernism, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.]

Economist (unsigned). 1997. “You can’t follow the science wars without a battle map”. The Economist (13 December): 77-79.

Ehrenreich, Barbara. 1992-93. “For the rationality debate”. Z Papers Special Issue on Postmodernism and Rationality. Available on-line at http://www.zmag.org/zmag/articles/ehrenrationpiece.html

Einstein, Albert. 1949. “Remarks concerning the essays brought together in this cooperative volume”. In Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, pages 665-688. Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp. Evanston, Illinois: Library of Living Philosophers.

Einstein, Albert. 1960 [1920]. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. London: Methuen.

Epstein, Barbara. 1995. “Why poststructuralism is a dead end for progressive thought”. Socialist Review 25(2): 83-120.

Epstein, Barbara. 1997. “Postmodernism and the left”. New Politics 6(2) (Winter): 130-144.

Eribon, Didier. 1994. Michel Foucault et ses contemporains. Paris: Fayard.

Euler, Leonhard. 1997 [1761]. “Refutation of the idealists”. In Letters of Euleer to a German Princess, volume I, letter XCVII, pp. 426-430. Translated by Henry Hunter (originally published 1795). With a new introduction by Andrew Pyle. London: Thoemmes Press. [French original: Lettres á une princesse d’Allemagne, lettre 97. In: Leonhardi Euleri Opera Omnia, série III, volume 11, pp. 219-220. Turici, 1911-.]

Ferguson, Euan. 1996. “Illogical dons swallow hoaxer’s quantum leap into gibberish”. The Observer [London] (19 May): 1.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. London: New Left Books.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1987. Farewell to Reason. London: Verso.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1988. Against Method, 2nd ed. London: Verso.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1992. “Atoms and consciousness”. Common Knowledge 1(1): 28-32.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1993. Against Method, 3rd ed. London: Verso.

Feyerabend, Paul. 1995. Killing Time: The Autobiography of Paul Feyerabend. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Feynman, Richard. 1965. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Foucault, Michel. 1970. “Theatrum philosophicum”. Critique 282: 885-908.

Fourez, Gérard. 1992. La Construction des sciences, 2éme édition revue. Brussels: De Boeck Université.

Fourez, Gérard, Véronique Englebert-Lecomte, and Philippe Mathy. 1997. Nos savoirs sur nos savoirs: Un Lexique d’épistémologie pour l’enseignement. Brussels: De Boeck Université.

Frank, Tom. 1996. “Textual reckoning”. In These Times 20(14) (27 May): 22-24.

Franklin, Allan. 1990. Experiment, Right or Wrong. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Franklin, Allan. 1994. “How to avoid the experimenters’ regress’. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25: 97-121.

Fuller, Steve. 1993. Philosophy, Rhetoric, and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Fuller, Steve. 1998. “What does the Sokal hoax say about the prospects for positivism?” To appear in the Proceedings of the International Colloquium on “Positivismes” (Université Libre de Bruxelles and University of Utrecht, 10-12 December 1997), under the aegis of the Académie Internationale d’Histoire des Sciences.

Gabon, Alain. 1994. Review of Rethinking Technologies. Substance #75: 119-124.

Ghins, Michel. 1992. “Scientific realism and invariance”. In Rationality in Epistemology, pp. 249-262. Edited by Enrique Villanueva. Atascadero, California: Ridgeview

Gingras, Yves. 1995. “Un air de radicalisme: Sur quelques tendances récentes en sociologie de la science et de la technologic”. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 108: 3-17.

Gingras, Yves, and Silvan S. Schweber. 1986. “Constraints on construction”. Social Studies of Science 16: 372-383.

Gottfried, Kurt, and Kenneth G. Wilson. 1997. “Science as a cultural construct”. Nature 386: 646-547.

Granon-Lafont, Jeanne. 1985. La Topologic ordinaire de Jacques Lacan. Paris: Point Hors Ligne.

Granon-Lafont, Jeanne. 1990. Topologic lacanienne et clinique analytique. Paris: Point Hors Ligne.

Greenberg, Marvin Jay. 1980. Euclidean and Non-Euclidean Geometries: Development and History, 2nd ed. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

Gross, Paul R., and Norman Levitt. 1994. Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Gross, Paul R., Norman Levitt, and Martin W Lewis, eds. 1996. The Flight from Science and Reason. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 775.

Grosser, Morton. 1962. The Discovery of Neptune. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Guattari, Félix. 1988. “Les énergétiques sémiotiques”. In: Temps et deuenir: A partir de l’?uvre d’Ilya Prigogine, pp. 83-100. Actes du colloque international de 1983 soul la direction de Jean-Pierre Brans, Isabelle Stengers et Philippe Vincke. Geneva: Patino.

Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Translated by Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. [French original: Chaosmose. Paris: Galilée, 1992.]

Harding, Sandra. 1996. “Science is ‘good to think with’ “. Social Text 46/47 (Spring/Summer): 15-26.

Havel, Václav. 1992. “The end of the modern era”. The New York Times (1 March): E-15.

Hawkins, Harriett. 1995. Strange Attractors: Literature, Culture and Chaos Theory. New York: Prentice-Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1992. “Gender encoding in fluid mechanics: Masculine channels and feminine flows”. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 4(2): 16-44.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1989 [1812]. Hegel’s Science of Logic. Translated by A.V. Miller. Foreword by J.N. Findlay. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press International.

Henley, Jon. 1997. “Euclidean, Spinozist or existentialist? Er, no. It’s simply a load of old tosh”. The Guardian (1 October): 3.

Hobsbawm, Eric. 1993. “The new threat to history”. New York Review of Books ( 16 December): 62-64. [Reprinted in Eric Hobsbawm, On History, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1997, chapter 1.]

Holton, Gerald. 1993. Science and Anti-Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Hume, David. 1988 [1748]. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Amherst, New York: Prometheus.

Huth, John. 1998. “Latour’s relativity”. To appear in: A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, edited by Noretta Koertge. New York: Oxford University Press.

Irigaray, Luce. 1985a “The ‘mechanics’ of fluids”. In This Sex Which Is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press. French original: L’Arc, no. 58 (1974). Reprinted in Ce sexe qui n’en est pas un, Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1977.]

Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. Parley n’est jamais neutre. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

Irigaray, Luce. 1987a “Le sujet de la science est-il sexué? / Is the subject of science sexed?” Translated by Carol Mastrangelo Bové. Hypatia 2(3): 65-87. [French original: Les Temps modernes 9, no. 436 (November 1982): 960-974. Reprinted in Irigaray 1985b.]

Irigaray Luce. 1987b. “Sujet de la science, sujet sexué?” In Sens et place des connaissances dans la société, pp. 95-121. Paris: Centre National de Recherche Scientifique.

Irigaray, Luce. 1993. “A chance for life: Limits to the concept of the neuter and the universal in science and other disciplines”. In Sexes and Genealogies, pp. 183-206. Translated by Gillian C. Gill. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: “Une chance de vivre: Limites au concept de neutre et d’universel dans les sciences et les savoirs”. In: Sexes et parentés. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1987.]

Johnson, George. 1996. “Indian tribes’ creationists thwart archeologists”. The New York Times (22 October): A1, C13.

Kadanoff, Leo P. 1986. “Fractals: Where’s the physics?” Physics Today 39 (February): 6-7.

Kellert, Stephen H. 1993. In the Wake of Chaos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kimball, Roger. 1990. Tenured Radicals: How Politics Has Corrupted Higher Education. New York: Harper & Row.

Kinoshita, Toichiro. 1995. “New value of the a3 electron anomalous magnetic moment”. Physical Review Letters 75: 4728-4731.

Koertge, Noretta, ed. 1998. A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science. New York: Oxford University Press..

Kristeva, Julia. 1969. Shmeiwtik?: Recherches pour une sémanalyse. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Kristeva, Julia 1974. La Révolution du langage poétique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Kristeva, Julia. 1977. Polylogue. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. Edited by Leon S. Roudiez. Translated by Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine, and Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lacan, Jacques. 1970. “Of structure as an inmixing of an otherness prerequisite to any subject whatever”. In The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man, pp. 186-200. Edited by Richard Macksey and Eugenio Donato. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

Lacan, Jacques. 1971. “Position de 1’inconscient”. In Écrits 2, pp. 193-217. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Lacan, Jacques. 1973. “L’Étourdit”. Scilicet, no. 4: 5-52.

Lacan, Jacques. 1975a. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre XX: Encore, 1972-1973. Texte établi par Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Lacan, Jacques. 1975b. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974-75. Séminaires du 10 et du 17 décembre 1974. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien no. 2: 87-105.

Lacan, Jacques. 1975c. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974-75. Séminaires du 14 et du 21 janvier 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien no. 3 (May): 95-110.

Lacan, Jacques. 1975d. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. (Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974-75. Séminaires du 11 et du 18 février 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien no. 4 (autumn): 91-106.

Lacan, Jacques. 1975e. Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan (XXII). Texte établi par J.A. Miller. R.S.I. [Réel, Symbolique, Imaginaire] Année 1974-75. Séminaires du 11 et du 18 mars, du 8 et du 15 avril, et du 13 mai 1975. Ornicar?: Bulletin périodique du champ freudien no. 5 (winter 1975/76): 17-66.

Lacan, Jacques. 1977a. “Desire and the interpretation of desire in Hamlet”. Translated by James Hulbert. Yale French Studies 55/56: 11-52.

Lacan, Jacques. 1977b. “The subversion of the subject and the dialectic of desire in the Freudian unconscious”. In Écrits: A Selection, pp. 292-325. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: Norton. [French original: “Subversion du sujet and dialectique du désir dans 1’inconscient freudien”. In Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1966.]

Lacan, Jacques. 1988. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. Book II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-1955. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated by Sylvana Tomaselli with notes by John Forrester. New York: Norton. [French original: Le séminaire de Jacques Lacan. Livre II: Le Moi dons la théorie de Freud et dans la technique de la psychanalyse, 1954-1955. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1978.]

Lacan, Jacques. 1998. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX, Encore 1972-1973. Edited by Jacques-Alain Miller. Translated with notes by Bruce Fink. New York: Norton. [French original: see Lacan 1975a.]

Lamont, Michéle. 1987. “How to become a dominant French philosopher. The case of Jacques Derrida”. American Journal of Sociology 93: 584-622.

Landsberg, Mitchell [Associated Press]. 1996. “Physicist’s spoof on science puts one over on science critics”. International Herald Tribune (18 May): 1.

Laplace, Pierre Simon. 1995 [5th ed. 1825]. Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Translated by Andrew I. Dale. New York: Springer-Verlag. [French original: Essai philosophique sur Les probabilités. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1986.]

Lather, Patti. 1991. Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. New York-London: Routledge.

Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno. 1988. “A relativistic account of Einstein’s relativity”. Social Studies of Science 18: 3-44.

Latour, Bruno. 1995. “Who speaks for science?” The Sciences 36(2) (March-April): 6-7.

Latour, Bruno. 1998. “Ramsés II est-il mort de la tuberculose?”. La Recherche 307 (March): 84-85. See also errata 308 (April): 85 and 309 (May): 7.

Laudan, Larry. 1981. “The pseudo-science of science?” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11: 173-198.

Laudan, Larry. 1990a. Science and Relativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laudan, Larry. 1990b. “Demystifying underdetermination”. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 267-297.

Lechte, John. 1990. Julia Kristeva. London-New York: Routledge.

Lechte, John. 1994. Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity. London-New York: Routledge.

Le Monde. 1984a. Entretiens avec Le Monde. 1. Philosophies. Introduction de Christian Delacampagne. Paris: Éditions La Découverte et Le Monde.

Le Monde. 1984b. Entretiens avec Le Monde. 3. Idées contemporaines. Introduction de Christian Descamps. Paris: Éditions La Découverte et Le Monde.

Leplin, Jarrett. 1984. Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Leupin, Alexandre. 1991. “Introduction: Voids and knots in knowledge and truth”. In: Lacan and the Human Sciences, pp. 1-23. Edited by Alexandre Leupin. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Lévy-Leblond, Jean-Marc. 1997. “La paille des philosopher et la poutre des physiciens”. La Recherche 299 (June): 9-10.

Lodge, David. 1984. Small World. New York: Macmillan.

Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Foreword by Fredric Jameson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [French original: La Condition postmoderne: Rapport sur le savoir. Paris: Éditions de Minnit, 1979.]

Maddox, John, James Randi and Walter W. Stewart. 1988. “ ‘High-dilution’ experiments a delusion”. Nature 334: 287-290.

Maggiori, Robert. 1997. “Fumée sans feu”. Libération (30 September): 29.

Markley, Robert. 1992. “The irrelevance of reality: Science, ideology and the postmodern universe.” Genre 25: 249-276.

Matheson, Carl and Evan Kirchhoff. 1997. “Chaos and literature”. Philosophy and Literature 21: 28-45.

Maudlin, Tim. 1994. Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern. Physics. Aristotelian Society Series, vol. 13. Oxford: Blackwell.

Maudlin, Tim. 1996. “Kuhn édenté: incommensurabilité et choix entre théories." [Original title: “Kuhn defanged: incommensurability and theory-choice.”] Translated by Jean-Pierre Deschepper and Michel Ghins. Revue philosophique de Louvain 94: 428-446.

Maxwell, James Clerk. 1952 [1st ed. 1876]. Matter and Motion. New York: Dover.

Mermin, N. David. 1989. Space and Time in Special Relativity. Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press.

Mermin, N. David. 1996a. “What’s wrong with this sustaining myth?” Physics Today 49(3) (March): 11-13.

Mermin, N. David. 1996b. “The Golemization of relativity”. Physics Today 49(4) (April): 11-13.

Mermin, N. David. 1996c. “Sociologists, scientist continue debate about scientific process”. Physics Today 49(7) (July): 11-15, 88.

Mermin, N. David. 1997a. “Sociologists, scientist pick at threads of argument about science”. Physics Today 50(1) (January): 92-95.

Mermin, N. David. 1997b. “What’s wrong with this reading”. Physics Today 60(10) (October): 11-13.

Mermin, N. David. 1998. “The science of science: A physicist reads Barnes, Bloor and Henry”. To appear in Social Studies of Science.

Miller, Jacques-Alain. 1977-78. “Suture (elements of the logic of the signifier)”. Screen, 18(4): 24-34.

Milner, Jean-Claude. 1995. L?uvre Claire: Lacan, la science, la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.

Moi, Toril. 1986. Introduction to The Kristeva Reader. New York: Columbia University Press.

Moore, Patrick. 1996. The Planet Neptune, 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Mortley, Raoul. 1991. French Philosophers in Conversation: Levinas, Schneider, Serres, Irigaray, Le Doeuff, Derrida. London: Routledge.

Nagel, Ernest and James R. Newman. 1958. Gödel’s Proof. New York: New York University Press.

Nancy, Jean-Luc and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe. 1992. The Title of the Letter: A Reading of Lacan. Translated by Francois Raffoul and David Pettigrew. Albany: State University of New York Press. [French original: Le Titre de la lettre, 3éme éd. Paris: Galilée, 1990.]

Nanda, Meera. 1997. “The science wars in India”. Dissent 44(1) (Winter): 78-83.

Nasio, Juan-David. 1987. Les Yeux de Laure: Le concept d’objet “a” dans la théorie de J. Lacan. Suivi d’une Introduction á la topologie psychanalytique. Paris: Aubier.

Nasio, Juan-David. 1992. “Le concept de sujet de l’inconscient”. Texte d’une intervention realisée dans le cadre du séminaire de Jacques Lacan “La topologie et le temps”, le mardi 15 mai 1979. In: Cinq leçons sur la théorie de Jacques Lacan. Paris: Éditions Rivages.

Newton-Smith, W.H. 1981. The Rationality of Science. London-New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Norris, Christopher. 1992. Uncritical Theory: Postmodernism, Intellectuals and the Gulf War. London: Lawrence and Wishort.

Perrin, Jean. 1990 [1913]. Atoms. Translated by D. Ll. Hammick. Woodbridge, Connecticut: Ox Bow Press. [French original: Les Atomes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de dance, 1970.]

Pinker, Steven. 1995. The Language Instinct. London: Penguin.

Plotnitsky, Arkady. 1997. “ ‘But it is above all not true’: Derrida, relativity, and the ‘science wars’ “. Postmodern Culture 7, no. 2. Available on-line at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/v007/7.2plotnitsky.html

Poincaré, Henri. 1952 [1909]. Science and Method. Translated by Francis Maitland. New York: Dover. [French original: Science et méthode. Paris: Flammarion, 1909.]

Pollitt, Katha. 1996. “Pomolotov cocktail”. The Nation (10 June): 9.

Popper, Karl R. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Translation prepared by the author with the assistance of Julius Freed and Lan Freed. London: Hutchinson.

Popper, Karl. 1974. “Replies to my critics”. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 2, edited by Paul A. Schilpp. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.

Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. 1988. Entre le temps et l’éternité. Paris: Fayard.

Putnam, Hilary. 1974. “The ‘corroboration’ of theories”. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, vol. 1, pp. 221-240. Edited by Paul A. Schilpp. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.

Putnam, Hilary. 1978. “A critic replies to his philosopher”. In Philosophy As It Is, edited by Ted Honderich and M. Burnyeat, pp. 377-380. New York: Penguin.

Quine, Willard Van Orman. 1980. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”. In From a Logical Point of View, 2nd ed., revised [lst ed. 1953]. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Ragland-Sullivan, Ellie. 1990. “Counting from 0 to 6: Lacan, ‘suture’, and the imaginary order”. In Criticism and Lacan: Essays and Dialogue on Language, Structure, and the Unconscious, pp. 31-63. Edited by Patrick Colm Hogan and Lalita Pandit. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press.

Raskin, Marcus G., and Herbert J. Bernstein. 1987. New Ways of Knowing: The Sciences, Society, and Reconstructive Knowledge. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman & Littlefield.

Rees, Martin. 1997. Before the Beginning: Our Universe and Others. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.

Revel, Jean-Francois. 1997. “Les faux prophétes”. Le Point (11 October): 120-121.

Richelle, Marc. 1998. Défense des sciences humaines: Vers une désokalisation? Sprimont (Belgium): Mardaga.

Robbins, Bruce. 1998. “Science-envy: Sokal, science and the police”. Radical Philosophy 88 (March/April): 2-5.

Rosenberg, John R. 1992. “The clock and the cloud: Chaos and order in El diablo mundo”. Revista de Estudios Hispánicos 26: 203-225.

Rosenberg, Martin E. 1993. Dynamic and thermodynamic tropes of the subject in Freud and in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture 4, no. 1. Available on-line at http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/postmodern_culture/v004/4.1rosenberg.html

Roseveare, N.T. 1982. Mercury’s Perihelion from Le Verrier to Einstein. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Ross, Andrew. 1995. “Science backlash on technoskeptics”. The Nation 261(10) (2 October): 346-350.

Ross, Andrew. 1996. “Introduction”. Social Text 46/47 (Spring/Summer): 1-13.

Rötzer, Florian. 1994. Conversations with French Philosophers. Translated from the German by Gary E. Aylesworth. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.

Roudinesco, Elisabeth. 1997. Jacques Lacan. Translated by Barbara Bray. New York: Columbia University Press. [French original: Jacques Lacan: Esquisse d’une vie, histoire d’un systéme de pensée. Pans: Fayard, 1993.]

Roustang, Francois. 1990. The Lacanian Delusion. Translated by Greg Sims. New York: Oxford University Press. [French original: Lacan, de l’équivoque á l’impasse. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1986.]

Ruelle, David. 1991. Chance and Chaos. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ruelle, David. 1994. “Where can one hope to profitably apply the ideas of chaos?” Physics Today 47(7) (July): 24-30.

Russell, Bertrand. 1948. Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Russell, Bertrand. 1949 [ 1920]. The Practice and Theory of Bolshevism, 2nd ed. London: George Allen and Unwin.

Russell, Bertrand. 1961a. History of Western Philosophy, 2"d ed. London: George Allen and Unwin. [Reprinted by Routledge, 1991.]

Russell, Bertrand. 1961b. The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell, 1903-1959. Edited by Robert E. Egner and Lester E. Denonn. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Russell, Bertrand. 1995 [1959]. My Philosophical Development. London: Routledge.

Sand, Patrick. 1998. “Left conservatism?” The Nation (9 March): 6-7.

Sartori, Leo. 1996. Understanding Relativity: A Simplified Approach to Einstein’s Theories. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Scott, Janny. 1996. “Postmodern gravity deconstructed, slyly”. The New York Times (18 May): 1, 22.

Serres, Michel. 1995. “Paris 1800”. In A History of Scientific Thought: Elements of a History of Science, pp. 422154. Edited by Michel Serres. Translated from the French. Oxford: Blackwell. [French original: Eléments d’histoire des sciences. Sous la direction de Michel Serres. Paris: Bordas, 1989, pp. 337-361.]

Shimony, Abner. 1976. “Comments on two epistemological theses of Thomas Kuhn”. In Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Edited by R. Cohen et al. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Academic Publishers.

Siegel, Harvey. 1987. Relativism Refuted: A Critique of Contemporary Epistemological Relativism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Silk, Joseph. 1989. The Big Bang, revised and updated ed. New York: WH. Freeman.

Slezak, Peter. 1994. “A second look at David Bloor’s Knowledge and Social Imagery”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24: 336-361.

Sokal, Alan D. 1996a. “Transgressing the boundaries: Toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity”. Social Text 46/47 (Spring/Summer): 217-252. Sokal, Alan. 1996b. “A physicist experiments with cultural studies”. Lingua Franca 6(4) (May/June): 62-64.

Sokal, Alan D. 1996c. “Transgressing the boundaries: An afterword”. Dissent 43(4) (Fall): 93-99. [A slightly abridged version of this article was published also in Philosophy and Literature 20: 33846 (1996).]

Sokal, Alan. 1997a “A plea for reason, evidence and logic”. New Politics 6(2) (Winter): 126-129.

Sokal, Alan. 1997b. “Alan Sokal replies [to Stanley Aronowitz]”. Dissent 44(1) (Winter): 110-111.

Sokal, Alan. 1998. “What the Social Text affair does and does not prove”. To appear in A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths About Science, edited by Noretta Koertge. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. “Un impossible débat”. Interview with Eric de Bellefroid. La Libre Belgique (1 October): 21.

Stove, D.C. 1982. Popper and After: Four Modern Irrationalists. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Sussmann, Hector J., and Raphael S. Zahler. 1978. “Catastrophe theory as applied to the social and biological sciences: A critique”. Synthese 37: 117-216.

Taylor, Edwin E and John Archibald Wheeler. 1966. Spacetime Physics. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

University of Warwick. 1997. “DeleuzeGuattari and Matter: A conference”. Philosophy Department, University of Warwick (UK), 18-19 October 1997. Conference description available on-line at http://www.csv.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/Philosophy/matter.html

Van Dyck, Robert S., Jr., Paul B. Schwinberg, and Hans G. Dehmelt. 1987. “New high-precision comparison of electron and positron g factors”. Physical Review Letters 59: 26-29.

Van Peer, Willie. 1998. “Sense and nonsense of chaos theory in literary studies”. In The Third Culture: Literature and Science, pp. 40-48. Edited by Elinor S. Shaffer. Berlin-New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Vappereau, Jean Michel. 1985. Essaim: Le Crroupe fondamental du n?ud. Psychanalyse et Topologie du Sujet. Paris: Point Hors Ligne.

Vappereau, Jean Michel. 1995. “Surmoi”. Encyclopaedia Universalis 21: 885-889.

Virilio, Paul. 1984. L’Espace critique. Paris: Christian Bourgois.

Virilio, Paul. 1989. “Trans-Appearance”. Translated by Diana Stoll. Artforum 27, no. 10 (1 June): 129-130.

Virilio, Paul. 1990. L’Inertie polaire. Paris: Christian Bourgois.

Virilio, Paul. 1991. The Lost Dimension. Translated by Daniel Moshenberg. New York: Semiotext(e). [French original: see Virilio 1984.]

Virilio, Paul. 1993. “The third interval: A critical transition”. Translated by Tom Conley. In Rethinking Technologies, pp. 3-12, edited by Verena Andermatt Conley on behalf of the Miami Theory Collective. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Virilio, Paul. 1995. La Vitesse de libération. Paris: Galilée.

Virilio, Paul. 1997. Open Sky. Translated by Julie Rose. London: Verso. [French original: see Virilio 1995.]

Weill, Nicolas. “La mystification pédagogique du professeur Sokal”. Le Monde (20 December): 1, 16.

Weinberg, Steven. 1977. The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Basic Books.

Weinberg, Steven. 1992. Dreams of a Final Theory. New York: Pantheon.

Weinberg, Steven. 1995. “Reductionism redux”. New York Review of Books 42(15) (5 October): 39-42.

Weinberg, Steven. 1996a. “Sokal’s hoax”. New York Review of Books 43(13) (8 August): 11-15.

Weinberg, Steven et al. 1996b. “Sokal’s hoax: An exchange”. New York Review of Books 43(15) (3 October): 54-56.

Willis, Ellen. 1996. “My Sokaled life”. Village Voice (25 June): 20-21.

Willis, Ellen et al. 1998. “Epistemology and vinegar”. [Letters in response to Sand 1998.] The Nation (11 May): 2, 59-60.

Zahler, Raphael S., and Hector J. Sussmann. 1977. “Claims and accomplishments of applied catastrophe theory”. Nature 269: 759-763.

Zarlengo, Kristina. 1998. ”J’accuse!” Lingua Franca 8(3) (April): 10-11.
 

Vissza a könyvhöz